Jangan Percaya Statistik, Tottenham Punya Banyak Peluang Matang Kok!

Nexify - Sekilas Tottenham hanya diam menunggu serangan balik saat menghadapi Liverpool pada duel lanjutan Premier League, Kamis (17/12/2020). Namun, fans Spurs di media sosial percaya bahwa tim mereka menciptakan lebih banyak peluang matang.

Ya, kali ini Tottenham harus mengaku kalah 1-2 dalam kunjungan ke Anfield. Sebenarnya laga berjalan seimbang dengan gaya main masing-masing, tapi kali ini The Reds keluar sebagai pemenang.

Jose Mourinho kembali menurunkan taktik khasnya pada laga ini. Spurs bertahan dengan baik, lalu menyengat lewat serangan balik cepat. Bahkan menciptakan beberapa peluang yang seharusnya bisa jadi gol.

Sesuai laga, Mourinho meyakini timnya tampil lebih baik, tentu Jurgen Klopp tidak setuju. Liverpool memang tampak lebih menyerang dan agresif.

Jose Mourinho postgame: "The best team lost.” 👀 pic.twitter.com/WkN5CQPI3W

— B/R Football (@brfootball)

Klaim Mourinho ini pun dibantah lewat statistik, ternyata Spurs kalah dalam hal penguasaan bola dan total tembakan -- bahkan terhitung kalah jauh.

Meski begitu, fans Spurs membalasnya dengan statistik lain yang lebih jelas, bahwa sebenarnya tim mereka pantas menang. Scroll ke bawah ya, Bolaneters!

Nih statistik lengkapnya

Won possession but u can't create a single big chance then accept 4. 🙂😊 pic.twitter.com/BpWcvTGLvf

— حلمـيـﮯ (@M7md7elmii)

Spurs punya 3 peluang matang tuh

So misleading. Possession and shots are irrelevant, that's how we set up to play. Why not put in that we had 3 big chances compared to Liverpool's 0?

— coys (@MeI98x)

Statistik bisa dibolak-balik sih

Not saying he’s right but Spurs had 4 big chances to Liverpool’s 0 big chances. You can flip stats either way

— Deuce fan page (@deuce_fan_page)

Apa sih definisi peluang matang?

It's a high risk strategy. Liverpool's system relies on carving out a large number of chances and expecting a couple to go in. Tottenham hoping for 1-2 good chances. 4 big chances but only 2 shots on target vs Liverpool's 11. The whole 'big chance' definition is also quite loose

— Shafiul19🏆* (@IsntItShuffle)

Boleh deh biar senang

If that makes you feel good, how can we hve zero chances if we scored 2 goals mate? We had 2 chances there n scored them both, that’s not counting mane hitting the bar and salahs poor shots straight at loris

— 2020 champs (@NabyAlcantara)

Harusnya Spurs menang sih

I’m a Spurs fan and Liverpool may be better, but Spurs blew this. Spurs had the clear cut chances and just blew it. Liverpool had a lucky deflected goal and then put Dier on his ass to the score the second on a set piece. For having the ball all game Liverpool didn’t do much.

— Scott Campbell (@Hooch20)

Mourinho > Klopp?

Mourinho > Klopp

— John Smith (⚒⚒⚒) (@JOHNSMITHH66)

Klopp emang paling beruntung

Mourinho is still the 🐐 manager, but as for who’s the luckiest manager of all time? That has to be Klopp

— #7 (@MarkAshiey23)

Spurs main lebih baik katanya

Having the ball doesn't mean they played better 👍 spurs had the better chances should've killed the game off

— Bd🐺 (@bdrushton04)

Yakin gak bakal juara!

Totenham is the worst team ever they only sit back and just wait for counter attacks some of you will call that a tactic but i will say they don’t have balls they are cowards and I’m so sure they won’t win the league even with all this hype.

— IANTHEEGR8 (@Iantheegr8)

Sumber: Twitter